This ban represents a critical shift in how societies view social media's influence on youth. It highlights the call for increased responsibility from tech companies in managing their platforms. As Australia sets this precedent, other nations may follow suit.
Dr. Kevin Gilliland elaborates on the psychological implications of social media on children, stressing the necessity of protective measures. His views underline the importance of mental health and cognitive development, advocating that children should be safeguarded from the adverse effects of early social media exposure.
The reaction among parents has been overwhelmingly positive, with many expressing a desperate need for legislative support. As the concerns surrounding social media's impact on children escalate, the Australian decision may serve as a rallying point for parents advocating for their children’s safety and well-being.
Australia is making headlines as it prepares to become the first country globally to implement a ban on social media for children under the age of 16. The Prime Minister touts this initiative as a significant reform in safeguarding the mental well-being of young individuals. Acclaimed clinical psychologist Kevin Gilliland applauded the government’s decision, emphasizing the need for parental protection. He believes that many parents are growing tired of waiting on tech companies and feel empowered now to demand this change from their governments. Gilliland highlights that social media poses substantial risks to the mental health of children, including exposure to inappropriate content such as pornography and the potential for addictive behavior. He argues that this ban could foster healthier cognitive development by restricting access during vulnerable years. With social media designed to attract attention and encourage rapid response behaviors, he advocates for allowing more time for brain development before exposing kids to such powerful platforms. Moreover, experts emphasize the importance of real-world experiences over virtual interactions. Prolonged engagement with social media can lead to lethargy and distorted perceptions of reality. As governments around the world look to Australia’s bold move, many parents are expressing their support for increased regulation on social media, asserting that protecting their children should be a top priority.I am at the beginning of my investment journey, planning to put 185K into dividend stocks so that I will be making up to 30% per year in dividend returns. any good stock recommendation on great performing stocks or Crypto will be appreciated.
There are so many kids in very remote areas in Australia, and social media is their main source of communication. Pornhub on the other hand is not banned for under 16s.
I think there’s a balance. You discipline your kids and don’t let them rule the roost, but you teach them responsibility and earning trust, which involves giving them freedoms.
My nephew & niece are saying some of their friends act like zombies because they are on social media so often they don’t forgot how to interact
When they get a job and buy their own phone...10 yr olds dont need a $1000 phone. Period
Australia just banned social media to children under 16. Good idea. It will never pass here.
