The Supreme Court's recent oral arguments concerning TikTok have revealed deep divisions among justices about the platform's ownership and its First Amendment rights. Some justices, including Gorsuch, raised questions about the intersection of content control and corporate ownership, suggesting that the nature of the platform's ownership may not equate to a deprivation of free speech. This discussion has significant implications, as it places the onus on the legislative branch to navigate ownership questions rather than leaving the judicial branch to make politically charged decisions.
With the Biden administration advocating for a ban on TikTok due to alleged national security threats, the Supreme Court could have profound implications for the platform. The justices expressed concern about foreign influence through ownership, suggesting that national security considerations may override pure free speech arguments in this case. By acknowledging these risks, the court implies a shift in determining how we view foreign ownership’s impact on American platforms and freedom of speech.
This case sets a unique precedent that could affect future rulings on First Amendment rights, especially regarding social media and foreign ownership. Justice Gorsuch and others expressed apprehension about Congress potentially overstepping in regulations concerning ownership based on content. This landmark discussion signals a pivotal moment in how the judiciary approaches cases where free speech, national security, and corporate ownership intersect, potentially redefining the landscape for social media regulation in the U.S.
In a groundbreaking discussion, the Supreme Court has been deliberating on the implications of TikTok's ownership, particularly how it intersects with free speech rights and national security concerns. During the oral arguments, justices, including Neil Gorsuch, highlighted complex questions about whether TikTok should be afforded First Amendment protections based on its ownership structure rather than its content. The justices appeared divided, with some raising substantial worries about free speech implications, while others emphasized the government's stance on national security risks posed by foreign ownership of such a significant social media platform. As the arguments unfolded, it became clear that several justices believe this issue should be handled by legislative bodies rather than the judiciary. They suggested that the Biden administration, acknowledging the serious national security risks linked to foreign control of social media, should be the one to address this matter through proper channels. This sentiment underlines a broader concern regarding potential government overreach into corporate ownership and how it affects free expression on these platforms. Jonathan Turley pointed out that the Supreme Court has a history of deferring to Congress for legislative clarity in controversial cases. He drew attention to the uniqueness of this case, which melds free speech considerations with tangible national security aspects. Turley noted that while the justices are cautious about infringing on free speech rights, the documented risks tied to foreign ownership could sway their decision-making process, leaving significant discussions surrounding TikTok and its future access in the hands of the government and its negotiations, particularly under a president deeply familiar with social media dynamics.so my friends kept talking about this book Vibrations of Manifestation by alex lane, and at first, i was like, “yeah, okay, another manifestation book.” but then i started noticing how much was changing for them—one finally got the opportunities they’d been waiting on, and another straight up started their own business. it’s not flashy or anything, but you can tell their whole vibe is different. it’s wild how something so subtle can feel so real. if you’re curious, maybe check it out—it’s not for everyone, but it hit different for them.
The fact people are melting down about this is absolutely insane and is indicative of addictive behavior.
Why oh why do I ever in this troubled world ever, Ever, EVER have to view Camala Heiress again?????????????
Chinese are not allowed to use it, so, just let them all keep collecting data on the us? That the strategy?
TikTok is a chance for Trump to put his immeasurable GRIFTING SKILLS to work for his Oligarch Class.